An aerospace model that learns from the tools engineers trust.
aero-foundation specializes an open-weights language model for flight control, aerodynamics, and handling qualities. It is trained with continued pretraining, then reinforcement learning in which every reward comes from an engineering tool that computes a checkable answer.
Engineering judgment, shaped by engineering checks.
Aerospace already has rigorous ways to tell a right answer from a wrong one. General-purpose models rarely use them, so they produce designs that read well and fail the first check. We train on the checks themselves.
Flight control design
Gains and architectures that meet stability margins, bandwidth, and time-response requirements.
Aerodynamic databases
Set up and run analyses, then assemble coefficient tables and derivatives that agree with the tools.
Handling qualities
Compute modal characteristics and grade them against MIL-F-8785C and MIL-STD-1797A flying-qualities criteria.
Requirements traceability
Link requirements to design artifacts and verification cases, in the style ARP4754B and DO-178C expect.
Propose. Check. Reward. Update.
Continued pretraining on a license-clean aerospace corpus gives the model the vocabulary. Reinforcement learning gives it judgment: the model proposes, a sandboxed tool checks, and the check is the reward. No learned reward model sits between the physics and the gradient.
Rewards computed, not judged.
Each verifier runs in a sandbox with timeouts and input validation. A tool that fails to converge returns zero reward, never a crash or a default pass. Where two tools overlap, we cross-check them to expose blind spots.
| Tool | Checks | Example reward |
|---|---|---|
| JSBSim | Nonlinear 6-DOF flight: trim, time responses, closed-loop behavior | Step response meets rise-time and overshoot specs |
| AVL | Vortex-lattice aero: lift, induced drag, moments, stability derivatives, neutral point | Geometry trims at the target CL with static margin in band |
| XFOIL | 2-D airfoil polars, transition, pressure distribution | Airfoil meets a cl/cd target at the given Reynolds number |
| OpenVSP | Parametric geometry, VSPAERO analysis | Valid geometry matching area and span constraints |
| python-control | Poles, gain and phase margins, bandwidth, step metrics | Loop meets margins with the specified crossover |
| HQ criteria | MIL-STD-1797A / MIL-F-8785C modal criteria: short period, CAP, Dutch roll, roll mode, spiral, bandwidth | Level 1 in every required flight phase |
The model proposes. Qualified tools decide.
aero-foundation is a ground-based engineering tool, not airborne software. The long-term path is tool qualification under DO-330, within programs that follow ARP4754B, DO-178C, and DO-331.
The model is a proposer
Non-deterministic and hard to specify, so its outputs are treated as unverified until checked. We do not plan to claim certification credit for the model itself.
The checkers are qualifiable
Deterministic, version-pinned tools whose behavior can be specified, tested, and placed under configuration management. Credit, if ever claimed, comes from independent verification of outputs.
- ARP4754B
- DO-178C
- DO-330
- DO-331
- MIL-STD-1797A
Traceability is built in from day one: data provenance manifests, training configurations, weight hashes, verifier hashes, and per-task evidence logs. Qualification is granted within a specific certification project by the relevant authority; nothing here is qualified today. This is engineering research, not regulatory advice.
Evidence before scale.
Each phase ends with a checkable exit criterion. Compute estimates in the experiment plan are stated as assumptions.
Foundations
Verifier harness, task bank, eval suite, provenance pipeline, base-model baselines.
RL with tool rewards
RLVR on a small base model with Phase 0 verifiers; no continued pretraining.
Continued pretraining
Aerospace corpus with license tagging, dedup, and decontamination.
CPT + RL at scale
Combined stages; closed-loop JSBSim, aero databases, traceability verifiers.
Qualification hardening
TOR and TQP drafts for the verifier tools; automated evidence.
Start with what exists.
Every source in these documents was opened and checked. Nothing is invented; everything is paraphrased.
- landscape.mdDomain LLMs for science and engineering, LLMs driving engineering tools, RL with verifiable rewards, and LLM work in aerospace and controls.
- data-sources.mdCandidate corpora with licenses, and what needs a paid license.
- verifiers.mdTools for the training loop, reward design, and computable handling-qualities criteria.
- certification.mdQualifying a model-based ground tool under DO-330, and the evidence it takes.
- experiment-plan.mdPhased experiment plan with compute assumptions.
Founding phase. No model yet.
The repository holds research and planning documents. There is no trained model and no capability claim. Work is tracked in GitHub issues under the Phase 0 milestone, on four tracks: data, verifiers, eval, and certification.
Cite this work
@software{aero_foundation_2026,
title = {aero-foundation: an aerospace engineering model
trained with tool-verified rewards},
author = {{Aerospace Superintelligence contributors}},
year = {2026},
url = {https://github.com/aerospace-superintelligence/aero-foundation},
license = {Apache-2.0}
}